As we get over the last blast of winter around here – and no, it is not common for the Triangle to receive several inches of snow in March – we thought it might be a good time to point out a few recent successes in the area as well. With spring around the corner, the warm weather will be back, and we can bask in the glow of these recent triumphs.
Chapel Hill Among Top 10 College Sports Towns
In another of its seemingly endless surveys, Forbes magazine announced a few weeks ago that Chapel Hill finished seventh among all college sports towns in America. For its rankings, Forbes looked at the universities that finished in the top 50 in the Director’s Cup, a competition that ranks schools based on their performances in all sports. After reviewing quality-of-life measures, Forbes ranked Chapel Hill No. 7 based on the town’s “excellent schools,” relatively low crime rate and student-friendly night life available to those who attend the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
As for Raleigh and Durham, sorry, but Forbes did not include N.C. State or Duke respectively on the list. In fact, it made a slight swipe at Duke in its first sentence describing Chapel Hill: “Put it this way: You’ll see many more Duke students making the short drive down Tobacco Road to Chapel Hill from Durham than vice versa.” Ouch!
If you must know who finished first, it was Ann Arbor, home to the University of Michigan.
Raleigh Among Top Five Fastest Growing Cities
A survey released near the end of 2008 by American City Business Journals found that Raleigh finished second only to Las Vegas in its “growth score” from 2002 to 2007. Researchers used population growth, private-sector employment growth, per capita income growth, and gross metropolitan product growth to assign a “growth score” to each of the 100 largest U.S. metros.
Based on the criteria, Las Vegas finished with a “growth score” of 37.95 to Raleigh’s 31.07. Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla., Austin, Texas, and Phoenix rounded out the top five. Note that for the study, Raleigh was counted separately from Durham, which is not how many residents view the area’s growth, and therefore its “growth score” is probably a low one.
Recent Comments